Logo image
Prevalence and Patterns of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure in Australian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies: A Systematic Review of Data Collection Approaches
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Prevalence and Patterns of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure in Australian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies: A Systematic Review of Data Collection Approaches

Sophia L. Young, Sarah E. Steane, Nykola L. Kent, Natasha Reid, Linda A. Gallo and Karen M. Moritz
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol.19, pp.1-20
2022
PMCID: PMC9603223
PMID: 36293721
pdf
Prevalence and Patterns of Prenatal Alcohol Exposure in Australian Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies A Systematic Review of Data Collection Approaches1.09 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013144View
Published Version

Abstract

alcohol data collection Interview pregnancy prenatal questionnaires surveys Systematic Review UniSC Diversity Area - Life Stages
This study sought to determine data collection approaches in Australian cohort studies and explore the potential impact on reported prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) prevalence and patterns. Inclusion criteria were that studies related to a general Australian antenatal population where PAE was assessed and reported. Studies were excluded if they were not peer reviewed, examined the prevalence of PAE in pregnancies complicated by alcohol use disorders, or were published in a language other than English. A systematic search of five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus) was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool. Results were synthesised using MetaXL. Data from 16 separate birth cohorts (n = 78 articles) were included. Included cohorts were either general cohorts that included alcohol as a variable or alcohol focused cohorts that were designed with a primary focus on PAE. PAE prevalence was estimated as 48% (95% CI: 38 to 57%). When subgroup analysis was performed, estimates of PAE prevalence when self administered surveys and interviews were used for data collection were 53% (95% CI: 41% to 64%) and 43% (95% CI: 28% to 59%), respectively. Use of trained assessors was an influencing factor of the prevalence estimates when data were collected via interview. Alcohol focused studies reported higher prevalence of PAE, regardless of method of survey administration. Where interviewer training is not possible, self administered questionnaires will likely provide the most reliable PAE estimates.

Details

Metrics

159 File views/ downloads
81 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Environmental Sciences
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image