Logo image
Preferential flow mechanisms identified from staining experiments in a forested hillslope
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Preferential flow mechanisms identified from staining experiments in a forested hillslope

Kirill M Gerke, Roy C Sidle and Dirk Mallants
Hydrological Processes, Vol.29(21), pp.4562-4578
2015
pdf
PDF - Author's Accepted Version2.05 MBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10468View
Published Version

Abstract

biomat flow pore-scale modeling water entry pressure runoff generation hydrophobicity soil layering
Field staining experiments in five different plots at two sites in Japan (Okaya in Nagano Prefecture and Konohara in Mie Prefecture) were undertaken to improve understanding of subsurface stormflow runoff within organic layers of natural forested hillslopes. This type of shallow lateral subsurface flow, specifically referred to as biomat flow, was observed only at the Okaya site based on staining experiments conducted under controlled water application rates. When the same irrigation rate (50-100 mm h-1) was applied to the Konohara site, overland flow without a significant shallow subsurface component was the dominant flow mechanism. Even in gently sloping (15-20°) forest soils at the Okaya site, biomat flow was responsible for lateral dye transport over much longer distances than sub-surface flow in the matrix of mineral soil layers. Based on analysis of staining pattern images observed in the Okaya site we conclude that: (i) the organic biomat layer could be divided into two sub-layers of different structure; (ii) biomat flow transported the dye tracer longer distances than subsurface flow in the matrix; and (iii) the biomat layer topography affected biomat flow by generating preferential flowpaths and subsequent percolation into the deeper soil. Based on field experimental results and pore-scale consideration of water infiltration into pores of soils with varying wettability properties, we hypothesized and developed a conceptual model for two key biomat flow mechanisms. The first mechanism considers lateral subsurface flow due to a permeability contrast between the much more porous and hence permeable biomat layer and the underlying mineral soil. The second mechanism involves a hydrophobic soil layer between the biomat and the underlying mineral soil. Flow across the hydrophobic layer is believed to occur when a threshold pore pressure is exceeded, i.e., as a result of a perched water table within the biomat layer. Lower pore pressures are needed to initiate flow when preferential flow paths exist that are less hydrophobic than the surrounding organic layers. Numerical models of catchment hydrology should include lateral biomat flow when such layers are present in hillslope soils, in addition to typical subsurface flow within the soil matrix. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Details

Metrics

253 File views/ downloads
1349 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Water Resources

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image