Logo image
Predicting Wood Density Using Resistance Drilling: The Effect of Instrument and Operator
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Predicting Wood Density Using Resistance Drilling: The Effect of Instrument and Operator

Vilius Gendvilas, David J. Lee, Dominic P. Kain, Chandan Kumar, Geoff M. Downes, Marco Lausberg and Jonathan J. Harrington
Forests, Vol.15(1), pp.1-13
2024
pdf
forests-15-00157-v24.78 MBDownloadView
Published VersionCC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

drilling resistance IML-Resi PD 400-500 basic density Southern Pine Pinus elliottii var. elliottii x P. caribaea var. hondurensis
The IML PD series Resi is an instrument designed to measure the drilling resistance of wood. Use of the IML PD series Resi instrument is rapidly becoming a routine method among Australian forest plantation growers for wood quality assessments. The major driver in the commercial uptake of the IML Resi is that it is fast, cheap, and sufficiently precise for commercial use, particularly when the data are processed through a user-friendly, web-based processor. This study examined whether the accuracy of wood density predictions was impacted by the use of different Resi tools and different operators, which has never been examined before. Seven Resi instruments were evaluated across six sites with two operators on plantation-grown Southern Pine (Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis (Sénéclauze) or hybrids between Pinus elliottii var. elliottii (Engelm) × P. caribaea var. hondurensis) trees. Two types of Resi instruments were used (IML Resi PD-400 and IML Resi PD-500), and all had been recently serviced or were new. The instruments were operated by experienced operators. Constant sampling conditions of feed speed 200 cm/min and 3500 RPM were used. The order of instrument use, and hence the order of operator assessment at each site, was randomized. The variance between Resi instruments was small. The measured mean basic density of 50 mm outerwood cores across all plots was 542 kg/m3, while Resi-predicted basic density varied among instruments between 535 and 547 kg/m3. One Resi instrument underpredicted basic density by 9 kg/m3 and another overpredicted by 5 kg/m3. The operator had no effect on the basic density prediction. Resi PD400 or PD500 instruments gave similar basic density predictions.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Forestry
Logo image