Out of sight and out of mind? Safety and procedural issues with disused and seasonal rail corridors

Christopher N Watling; Gregoire Larue; Andrew Kidcaff; Claudia Luke

doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101006

Back

Out of sight and out of mind? Safety and procedural issues with disused and seasonal rail corridors

Journal article

Peer reviewed

Out of sight and out of mind? Safety and procedural issues with disused and seasonal rail corridors

Christopher N Watling, Gregoire Larue, Andrew Kidcaff and Claudia Luke

Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol.12, pp.1-9

2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101006

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101006View

Published Version

Abstract

rail safety

level crossing

signage

policy

legislation guidance

interviews

Several disused and seasonal rail corridors exist in various Australasian jurisdictions that require maintenance and are accessed by road users via rail crossings. However, no research is available that examines the safety and procedural issues with these rail corridors and connected level crossings. Targeted interviews with key stakeholders (N = 15) with knowledge and experience with safety, policy, and procedures of disused lines within Australia were performed. The results suggested there was limited communication provided back to road users (e.g., via new signage) about changing rail activity; potentially increasing the risk at rail corridors. Many of the operational concerns with disused lines were framed in terms of negative financial and business-based outcomes with the local community, including resident backlash. A clear outcome was the need to pursue procedural opportunities relating to all aspects of managing a disused line. This included more specific definitions, standards, and procedures for transferring a line to a disused status, clear maintenance standards, and a well-defined process with line reopening, including communicating with local residents. Issues related to safety was a common theme throughout the interviews and it was proposed that procedural opportunities could contribute to reducing safety issues and promote consistency across the rail network.

Details

Title: Out of sight and out of mind? Safety and procedural issues with disused and seasonal rail corridors
Authors: Christopher N Watling (Corresponding Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Gregoire Larue (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Road Safety Research Collaboration
Andrew Kidcaff (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Claudia Luke (Author) - Queensland University of Technology
Publication details: Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol.12, pp.1-9
Publisher: Elsevier BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101006
ISSN: 2213-6258
Organisation Unit: University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Law and Society; Road Safety Research Collaboration
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99717597702621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

53 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Transportation

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites