Logo image
Opposing Lethal Wildlife Research When Non-Leathal Methods Exist: Scientific Whaling as a Case Study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Opposing Lethal Wildlife Research When Non-Leathal Methods Exist: Scientific Whaling as a Case Study

Courtney Waugh and Vaughan Monamy
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management, Vol.7(1), pp.231-236
2016
pdf
PDF - Published Version1.66 MBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.3996/072015-JFWM-061View
Published Version

Abstract

whaling non-leathal methods
As our understanding of sentience in certain wildlife species grows, and technological advancements promote non-lethal data collection, we believe that we ought to adjust our field methods to incorporate a regime of best practice that prioritizes non-lethal methodologies over inhumane methods of lethal sampling. In addition, progress already made towards non-lethal methodologies in wildlife research needs to be promoted widely. In this paper, we examine whether lethal methods of whale research, using Japanese lethal scientific whaling as a case study, are ethical when the scientific information can be gained from non-lethal methods, and humane methods of killing are not available. As a part of a simple ethical decision-making model, we explore if a requirement for 'refinement' of scientific technique (sensu Russell & Burch 1959; three Rs), promoted extensively for laboratory-based animal experimentation, has direct applicability to scientific research involving free-living wildlife. We argue that 'refinement' is an appropriate ethical principle in all cases where scientific research involves a choice between non-lethal sampling and the deliberate killing of free-living wildlife for scientific purposes. We conclude that the welfare of individual animals and the conservation of free-living wildlife populations are both worthy of moral consideration and need not be incompatible in humane wildlife research and management.

Details

Metrics

87 File views/ downloads
797 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Biodiversity Conservation
Ecology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#14 Life Below Water

Source: InCites

Logo image