Opportunistic immunising in the paediatric emergency department: Are patients due vaccines?

Leanne Philips; Jeanine Young; Lesley A Williams; Marie Cooke; Claire M Rickard

doi:10.1016/j.auec.2018.12.002

Back

Opportunistic immunising in the paediatric emergency department: Are patients due vaccines?

Journal article

Peer reviewed

Opportunistic immunising in the paediatric emergency department: Are patients due vaccines?

Leanne Philips, Jeanine Young, Lesley A Williams, Marie Cooke and Claire M Rickard

Australasian Emergency Care, Vol.22(1), pp.28-33

2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2018.12.002

Appears in UniSC Diversity and Inclusion Research Collection

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2018.12.002View

Published Version

Abstract

immunisation

emergency department

child

healthy people programs

UniSC Diversity Area - Life Stages

Background: The aim of this study was to identify if patients presenting to a paediatric emergency department were due National Immunisation Program recommended vaccines in order to determine missed opportunities for vaccination or vaccination referral. Method: A hospital chart audit assessed the documentation of an immunisation history, in comparison to the immunisation histories available from national and state immunisation databases to determine accuracy; to identify if patients were due vaccines as determined by the National Immunisation Program; and to identify factors associated with those due vaccines. Results: Potential opportunities to vaccinate children due vaccines were missed (10/114, 8.8%); with less than half (4/10, 40%) correctly documented as due vaccines. Despite identification of due vaccines, no vaccines were administered. Almost one third of patients (34/114, 30%) had no immunisation history documented in the chart. 'Medically at risk' children (Odds Ratio [OR] 29.7, 95% CI 4.5-196, p < 0.001) were statistically more likely to be due vaccines. Likelihood of being due vaccines was higher, but not statistically significant, for those with no identified general practitioner (OR 4.5, 95% CI 0.96-20.6, p = 0.08), and for those presenting with injury rather than illness (OR 2.0, 95%CI 0.51-8.1, p = 0.48). Conclusion: Opportunities to vaccinate children presenting to the emergency department are currently being missed. A particular focus is needed for 'medically at risk' children and those with no identified general practitioner. Larger studies may confirm other risk factors. Further research is required into the attainment of an immunisation history during the hospital admission process and the accuracy of these methods.

Details

Title: Opportunistic immunising in the paediatric emergency department: Are patients due vaccines?
Authors: Leanne Philips (Author) - Lady Cilento Children's Hospital
Jeanine Young (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast - School of Nursing, Midwifery & Paramedicine
Lesley A Williams (Author) - Lady Cilento Children's Hospital
Marie Cooke (Author) - Griffith University
Claire M Rickard (Author) - Griffith University
Publication details: Australasian Emergency Care, Vol.22(1), pp.28-33
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd.
Date published: 2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2018.12.002
ISSN: 2588-994X; 2588-994X
Organisation Unit: School of Health - Nursing; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine - Legacy
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99451481302621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

239 Record Views

2 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Emergency Medicine; Nursing