Journal article
Nursing degree students’ clinical placement experiences in Australia: A survey design
Nurse Education in Practice, Vol.54, pp.1-7
2021
PMID: 34126584
Abstract
Aim:
This study aimed to evaluate Australian nursing students’ views of placements at seven tertiary education institutions with the use of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET).
Background:
Clinical placements are a core element of healthcare education programs around the world (Chuan and Barnett, 2012) with undergraduate nursing students required to complete a prescribed number of hours as part of their degree. The quality of nursing clinical placements varies with a range of positive and negative learning experiences.
Design:
A survey design was used with a contemporary survey tool– the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET). Using Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, 2005) the on-line survey was distributed to approximately 6265 undergraduate nursing students at six Australian universities and one Technical and Further Education (TAFE) college where Bachelor of Nursing degree students were enrolled. Three Australian States were covered. Sites were selected where a project team member was employed.
Methods:
A total of 1263 nursing students completed the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) − 19 items (rated 1–5), one global rating (rated 1–10) − following placement in three Australian States (July 2019−February 2020). Most - 618 (48.9%) completed a placement in acute care with placements positively rated overall.
Results:
The total PET mean score was 78.3% with 29.8% being ‘extremely satisfied’ (10 out of 10 – Item 20). However, 11.0% were dissatisfied with global ratings of four or less, whilst ratings between States differed significantly (p = <0.001). One third of respondents answered a free text statement relating to placement experiences, with significantly more comments from older students (p = <0.001) and from those with ratings in the lower range (p = <0.001). Three core themes emerged: 1. Staff Attitudes to Students, 2. Environment and 3. Lifestyle.
Conclusions:
Whilst students’ clinical experiences in Australia tend to be positive a minority reported exposure to negative staff attitudes, in unsafe environments, with lifestyle detriments. Further work is required to understand and enhance student experiences.
Details
- Title
- Nursing degree students’ clinical placement experiences in Australia: A survey design
- Authors
- Elise Luders (Author) - Federation UniversitySimon Cooper (Author) - Federation UniversityRobyn Cant (Author) - Federation UniversityDonna Waters (Author) - The University of SydneyMarion Tower (Author) - Central Queensland UniversityAmanda Henderson (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine - LegacyKerry Hood (Author) - Holmesglen Institute of TAFEGeorgina Willetts (Author) - Swinburne University of TechnologyColleen Ryan (Author) - Central Queensland UniversityKerry Reid-Searl (Author) - Central Queensland University
- Publication details
- Nurse Education in Practice, Vol.54, pp.1-7
- Publisher
- Elsevier Ltd
- Date published
- 2021
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103112
- ISSN
- 1873-5223
- PMID
- 34126584
- Organisation Unit
- School of Health - Nursing; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine - Legacy
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99541107202621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
62 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Nursing
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: SDGs from InCites