Logo image
Nature positive? Commodification, speciesism, abjection in Australia's environmental law reform
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Nature positive? Commodification, speciesism, abjection in Australia's environmental law reform

Jane Palmer and Jennifer Lynn Carter
Geographical Research, Vol.63(3), pp.390-404
2025
pdf
Geographical Research - 2025 - Palmer - Nature positive Commodification speciesism abjection in Australia s427.26 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

abjection anthropocentrism Australian environmental legislation commodification of nature ground truthing speciesism
Proposed "nature positive" revisions to the Australian Government's environmental legislation would further entrench an anthropocentric conception of nature as a commodity able to be metricised, traded, and/or replaced. The proposed legislation also manifests a form of speciesism, focusing on threatened species at the expense of other animals whose habitat would continue to be destroyed, and fails to account for future likely changes in the survivability of various species. Moreover, it takes little account of the suffering of individual animals nor the agential role of animals, plants, rocks, and mountains in more-than-human world-making, thus placing those nonhumans in abjection-that is, accorded no moral considerability. Using the Australian case to anchor our discussion, we conclude that truly "nature positive" approaches to the environment require a shift in emphasis from principally enabling "sustainable" exploitation of resources by humans, toward a focus on sustaining the multitude of context-specific, intensely relational networks of humans-other-than-humans. These relations engender a responsibility on the part of humans, when intervening through legislation, policy or practice, to pay deep attention to the specifics of nonhuman standpoints, subjectivities and relations with place-ground truthing-so that greater knowledge and critical, less anthropocentric thinking can underpin more ethical regulatory frameworks.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Geography

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image