Logo image
Mythbusting Medical Writing: Goodbye, Ghosts! Hello, Help!
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Mythbusting Medical Writing: Goodbye, Ghosts! Hello, Help!

Cindy W Hamilton, Art Gertel, Adam Jacobs, Jackie Marchington, Shelley Weaver and Karen L Woolley
Accountability in Research, Vol.23(3), pp.178-194
2016
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2015.1088788View
Published Version

Abstract

authorship collaboration conflict of interest By Publication publication ethics science communication
To meet ethical and scientific obligations, authors should submit timely, high-quality manuscripts. Authors, however, can encounter ethical (e.g., authorship designation) and practical (e.g., time and resource limitations) challenges during manuscript preparation. Could professional medical writers-not ghostwriters-help authors address these challenges? This essay summarizes evidence countering three myths that may have hindered authors from considering the use of professional medical writers. Authors with sufficient time, writing expertise, and reporting guideline knowledge may meet their obligations without writing assistance. Unfortunately, not all authors are in this position. Decisions about writing support should be based on evidence, not myths.

Details

Metrics

8 File views/ downloads
788 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Medical Ethics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image