Logo image
Missing Data: The Importance and Impact of Missing Data from Clinical Research
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Missing Data: The Importance and Impact of Missing Data from Clinical Research

Christine R Padgett, Clive E Skilbeck and Mathew J Summers
Brain Impairment, Vol.15(1), pp.1-9
2014
url
https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2014.2View
Published Version

Abstract

Medical and Health Sciences Psychology and Cognitive Sciences missing data multiple imputation traumatic brain injury
There is compelling evidence that traditional methods used to address the detrimental impacts of missing data are inadequate. Despite this, researchers have been slow to utilise newer statistical approaches known to be more effective. The aim of the current article is to offer a conceptual explanation of the rationale for using newer missing data techniques, with a focus on multiple imputation (MI). To illustrate the relative efficacy of deletion, single imputation and multiple imputation techniques in the clinical setting, 20 cases were selected randomly from a population study investigating the cognitive sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI), and 8 out of 20 cases had scores on one variable deleted to simulate a missing data set. Comparing the parameter estimates obtained by each technique to the known parameters of the complete data set revealed that MI outperformed deletion and single imputation approaches. It is therefore recommended that more sophisticated techniques such as MI should be considered in clinical research.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Neurosciences
Rehabilitation

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image