Journal article
Methods for tagging whale sharks: insights into performance and best practices with a focus on clamp attachments
Animal Biotelemetry, Vol.14, pp.1-24
2026
PMCID: PMC13263205
PMID: 42292739
Abstract
Background
Biologging and telemetry have transformed our understanding of marine megafauna movement ecology. Yet, methodological constraints continue to limit data quality and deployment duration. Devices recording whale shark (Rhincodon typus) behaviours and movements have been used for decades, but they remain challenging to deploy and vary in success. Recently, spring-loaded clamp-based systems have emerged as one of the most widely used approaches to attach electronic tags to the fins of this globally endangered species. Currently, however, no consensus guidelines exist as to how to optimise this approach, potentially leading to continued underperforming deployments limiting analysis potential. Here, we synthesise experiences with clamp-based tagging worldwide through a targeted survey of whale shark researchers. We explore performance and challenges with a view to propose current best practices in the field.
Results
Whale shark researcher responses to the survey highlighted clamp-based systems as a practical and more widely applicable approach than drill-based methods, which are often used to secure tags to other large sharks. They also noted that clamps have greater retention potential and are suitable for a wider range of tags compared to dart-based methods, but are still constrained by design, placement, and deployment conditions. Researchers used a variety of materials and designs to build their own clamps, often facilitated by direct collaboration with each other or key manufacturers. Clamps produced highly variable outcomes, ranging from successful long-term satellite transmissions over 200 days and short-term biologging for 48 h at 20 Hz, to premature detachment and cases of fin damage. For long-term clamps, changes in position on the fin allowed for more stable satellite transmissions over time. Some clamp designs achieved data quantity and quality close to that of drilled deployments, demonstrating their potential to rival traditional methods while offering a less invasive approach. Results emphasised the ongoing need for technological refinement and rigorous evaluation of clamp performance and associated impacts.
Conclusions
Based on collective insights, we present a unified approach to clamp design and positioning, and identify key priorities for advancing this attachment technology, such as aiming for positions b-2 and c-2 on the fin and ensuring the clamp bridge distance (always between 30 and 50 mm) and tension are matched to shark size. Optimising clamp systems could substantially improve our ability to generate high-quality, long-duration movement data while minimising tagging impacts on the animal where possible. This could enhance ecological and conservation research outcomes for endangered whale sharks, with broader implications for tagging other large-bodied marine megafauna.
Details
- Title
- Methods for tagging whale sharks: insights into performance and best practices with a focus on clamp attachments
- Authors
- Freya C. Womersley (Corresponding Author) - Marine Biological Association of the United KingdomSofia Green - Galápagos Whale Shark ProjectAlberto Garcia-Baciero - Instituto Politécnico NacionalRonan Conlon - Marine Biological Association of the United KingdomAmy L. Jeffries - Marine Biological Association of the United KingdomMatt J. Waller - Marine Biological Association of the United KingdomSara S. Ratao - Marine Biological Association of the United KingdomNuno Queiroz - Universidade do PortoPedro Afonso - Universidade dos AçoresGonzalo Araujo - Qatar UniversitySee full text for complete author listingSimon J. Pierce - University of the Sunshine Coast
- Publication details
- Animal Biotelemetry, Vol.14, pp.1-24
- Publisher
- BioMed Central Ltd.
- Date published
- 2026
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40317-026-00462-4
- ISSN
- 2050-3385
- PMID
- 42292739; PMC13263205
- Copyright note
- This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
- Data Availability
- Raw information provided by researchers who filled out the questionnaire is not available publicly but has been anonymously summarised throughout the manuscript. The work included no original code.
- Grant note
- F.C.W., R.C., A.J., M.W., E.J.S., and D.W.S. were supported by a European Research Council Advanced Grant (no.883583 OCEAN DEOXYFISH) awarded to D.W.S within the European Union Horizon 2020 Research Programme. D.W.S. is supported by a Marine Biological Association Senior Research Fellowship.
- Organisation Unit
- School of Science, Technology and Engineering
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 991246799302621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
1 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Ecology
- Marine & Freshwater Biology
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: SDGs from InCites