Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions

C N Cook; R W (Bill) Carter; R A Fuller; M Hockings

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.002

Back

Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions

Journal article

Peer reviewed

Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions

C N Cook, R W (Bill) Carter, R A Fuller and M Hockings

Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.113, pp.341-346

2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.002

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.002View

Published Version

Abstract

conservation management

conservation practitioners

decision-making

evidence

prioritization

science-based management

Protected area managers often fail to use empirical evidence for their management decisions, yet it is unclear whether this arises from a lack of available data, difficulty in interpreting scientific information for management application, or because managers do not value science for their decisions. To better understand the use of evidence for management decisions, we asked protected area managers in Australia what information is important when making decisions, the types of evidence they find most valuable, and the types of evidence they have for their protected areas. Managers described a complex array of information needed for management decisions, with nine different factors representing decisions about individual management issues and how to prioritize management actions. While managers reported less access to empirical evidence than other sources, this is not because they do not value it, reporting it to be the most valuable source of evidence. Instead, they make up the shortfall in empirical evidence with experience and information synthesized from multiple lines of evidence, which can provide important context for their decisions. We conclude that managers value a diversity of evidence because they face complex conservation decisions. Therefore, while empirical evidence can play an important role, alone this cannot provide all the knowledge managers need.

Details

Title: Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions
Authors: C N Cook (Author) - The University of Queensland
R W (Bill) Carter (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast - Faculty of Arts and Business
R A Fuller (Author) - The University of Queensland
M Hockings (Author) - The University of Queensland
Publication details: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol.113, pp.341-346
Publisher: Academic Press
Date published: 2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.002
ISSN: 0301-4797; 0301-4797
Grant note: C.N. Cook was supported by the Australian Research Council, Parks Victoria, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage and the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.
Organisation Unit: School of Social Sciences - Legacy; School of Law and Society; Sustainability Research Cluster
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99450503302621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

37 File views/ downloads

669 Record Views

96 Times Cited - Web of Science

See more details

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Environmental Sciences

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites