Logo image
Lived Experience Collaboration in Eating Disorders Research: Perspectives of Those With Lived Experience, Carers, Clinicians and Researchers
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Lived Experience Collaboration in Eating Disorders Research: Perspectives of Those With Lived Experience, Carers, Clinicians and Researchers

Erica Neill, Stephanie Miles, Rosiel Elwyn, Grace Fountas, Inge Gnatt, Zoe Jenkins, Amy Malcolm, Selma Music, Tamara Simpson, Caitlin Yolland, …
European Eating Disorders Review, Vol.Advanced access
26-Feb-2026
PMID: 41744417
pdf
Euro Eating Disorders Rev - 2026 - Neill - Lived Experience Collaboration in Eating Disorders Research Perspectives of884.67 kBDownloadView
Published Version (Advanced Access) Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

Clinical psychology Clinical and health psychology Eating disorders lived experience co-design co-production anorexia nervosa bulimia nervosa ARFID binge eating disorder consumer academics participatory action research benefits and risks carers collaboration Thompson Institute Special Collection Other Collaborations
Objective The importance of including people with a lived experience (LE) of eating disorders (ED) in the development and conduct of research is being recognised for the value it brings to the field. While the risks and benefits are beginning to be understood, there is still a lack of clarity around how to support LE partners through the process. This study examined perspectives on LE collaboration in ED research from individuals with personal LE, carers, clinicians, and researchers. Methods An online survey yielded 122 participants: 71 with personal LE, 37 carers, 21 clinicians, and 18 researchers. Results While researchers generally supported LE collaboration, carers were more hesitant. Across groups, the main perceived benefit was producing more meaningful research and improved treatments, while the primary concern was the risk of relapse for LE contributors. Views varied on the appropriate illness stage for LE involvement, though most agreed that readiness should be assessed collaboratively. Researchers strongly endorsed the development of ED-specific guidelines for LE engagement. Conclusions Overall, each of the groups valued LE input but identified a need for clearer guidance on safe and effective collaboration.

Details

Metrics

3 Record Views
Logo image