Journal article
Intraoperative cell salvage: The impact on immune cell numbers
PLoS One, Vol.18(8), pp.1-19
2023
PMCID: PMC10393166
PMID: 37527263
Abstract
Background: Patient outcomes are influenced by many confounding factors peri-operatively, including the type of surgery, anaesthesia, transfusion, and immune competence. We have previously demonstrated (in-vitro) that compared to allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT), intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) improves immune competence. The peri-operative immune response is complex. Altered or impaired immune responses may predispose patients to develop adverse outcomes (i.e., post-operative wound infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection etc.) Surgical patients may develop infection, even without the confirmed presence of a definite microbiological pathogen. With all these factors in mind it is important to consider changes in immune cell numbers (and sub-populations) and functional capacity during peri-operative transfusion.
Methods: In this TRIMICS-Cell (Transfusion Related Immune Modulation and Intraoperative Cell Salvage-Cell numbers) study (n = 17, October 2018-November 2019) we prioritized and analysed peri-operative changes in the number and proportions of immune cell populations and sub-populations (B cells (CD20+), NK (natural killer) cells (CD56+), monocytes (CD14+), T cells (total CD3+ and sub-populations: T helper cells (CD4+), cytotoxic T cells (CD8+), effector T cells (CD4+ CD127+), activated effector T cells (CD4+ CD25+ CD127+) and regulatory T cells (CD4+ CD25+ CD127-)), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC;
Lineage-, HLA-DR+, CD11c-, CD123+), classical dendritic cell (cDC) (Lineage-, HLA-DR+, CD11c+), and cDC activation (Lineage-, HLA-DR+, CD11c+), co-stimulatory/adhesion molecules and pDC (CD9+, CD38+, CD80+, CD83+, CD86+, CD123+). Firstly we analysed the whole cohort of study patients and secondly according to the relevant transfusion modality (i.e., three study groups: those who received no transfusion, received ICS only (ICS), or both ICS and allogeneic packed red blood cells (pRBC) (ICS&RBC)), during major orthopaedic surgery.
Results: For the whole study cohort (all patients), changes in immune cell populations were significant: leucocytes and specifically neutrophils increased post-operatively, returning towards pre-operative numbers by 48h post-operatively (48h), and lymphocytes reduced post-operatively returning to pre-operative numbers by 48h. When considering transfusion modalities, there were no significant peri-operative changes in the no transfusion group for all immune cell populations studied (cell numbers and proportions (%)). Significant changes in cell population numbers (i.e., leucocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes) were identified in both transfused groups (ICS and ICS&RBC). Considering all patients, changes in immune cell sub-populations (NK cells, monocytes, B cells, T cells and DCs) and functional characteristics (e.g., co-stimulation markers, adhesion, activation, and regulation) were significant peri-operatively and when considering transfusion modalities. Interestingly DC numbers and functional capacity were specifically altered following ICS compared to ICS&RBC and pDCs were relatively preserved post-operatively following ICS.
Conclusion: A transient peri-operative alteration with recovery towards pre-operative numbers by 48h post-surgery was demonstrated for many immune cell populations and sub-populations throughout. Immune cell sub-populations and functional characteristics were similar peri-operatively in those who received no transfusion but changed significantly following ICS and ICS&RBC. Interesting changes that require future study are a post-operative monocyte increase in the ICS&RBC group, changes in cDC considering transfusion modalities, and possibly preserved pDC numbers post-operatively following ICS. Future studies to assess changes in immune cell sub-populations, especially during peri-operative transfusion, while considering post-operative adverse outcomes, is recommended.
Details
- Title
- Intraoperative cell salvage: The impact on immune cell numbers
- Authors
- Michelle RoetsI (Corresponding Author) - The University of QueenslandDavid John Sturgess (Author) - The University of QueenslandThu Vinh Tran (Author) - Australian Red Cross LifebloodMaheshi Prabodani Obeysekera (Author) - Australian Red Cross LifebloodAlexis J Perros (Author) - Australian Red Cross LifebloodJohn-Paul Tung (Author) - The University of QueenslandRobert Lewis Powell Flower (Author) - Australian Red Cross LifebloodAndre van Zundert (Author) - The University of QueenslandMelinda Dean (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health - Biomedicine
- Publication details
- PLoS One, Vol.18(8), pp.1-19
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science
- Date published
- 2023
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0289177
- ISSN
- 1932-6203
- PMID
- 37527263; PMC10393166
- Copyright note
- © 2023 Roets et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Grant note
- Royal Brisbane and Women’s hospital Australian Red Cross Lifeblood Australian National Blood Authority
- Organisation Unit
- School of Health - Biomedicine; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Health and Behavioural Sciences - Legacy
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99743098702621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
2 File views/ downloads
50 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Immunology
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: SDGs from InCites