Logo image
International expert perspectives on access, engagement, and implementation of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: A Delphi study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

International expert perspectives on access, engagement, and implementation of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: A Delphi study

Rosalie Ariane Eva Altman, Eric Josiah Tan and Susan Lee Rossell
Psychological Services, Vol.23(1), pp.22-30
2026
PMID: 39541545
pdf
2025-45588-001346.87 kBDownloadView
Published Version (Advanced Access)CC BY V4.0 Open Access

Abstract

cognitive remediation schizophrenia implementation health services accessibility Delphi
Cognitive remediation (CR) for schizophrenia has been extensively studied and has proven effective in improving both cognition and functioning. Yet, implementation into mental health services is poor, with implementation and engagement barriers and facilitators not understood. The present study aimed to assess expert opinions on CR barriers and facilitators that pertain to staff, mental health services, and consumers. Thirty-seven international CR experts (clinicians/researchers) responded to Likert-scale questions on implementation and engagement facilitators, essential CR components, barriers in mental health facilities, barriers for clinicians, and barriers for consumer access and engagement across three rounds of a Delphi survey. The main barriers to CR implementation were (a) lack of staff training, (b) lack of perceived relevance/lack of knowledge about cognitive deficits in schizophrenia and CR usefulness in both clinicians and consumers, as well as (c) lack of staff employed in cognitive rehabilitation roles. The presence of defeatist beliefs and difficulty in accessing the place of delivery were both barriers to consumer engagement and access. The most important facilitators for CR were a good therapeutic alliance, CR delivered as part of integrated rehabilitation services, psychoeducation provided to families and stakeholders, and CR focusing on generalization of learning to everyday life. This study highlights the barriers to CR implementation from experts. A multitude of factors were identified that need attention. It is also apparent that CR cost-effectiveness studies are needed to facilitate organizational change and national guideline recommendations for improving mental health services policy around serious mental illness/schizophrenia health care provisions.

Details

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
48 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Psychology, Clinical

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image