Journal article
In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries
Affective Science, Vol.3(3), pp.577-602
2022
PMID: 36185503
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic (and its aftermath) highlights a critical need to communicate health information effectively to the global public. Given that subtle differences in information framing can have meaningful effects on behavior, behavioral science research highlights a pressing question: Is it more effective to frame COVID-19 health messages in terms of potential losses (e.g., " If you do not practice these steps, you can endanger yourself and others ") or potential gains (e.g., " If you practice these steps, you can protect yourself and others ")? Collecting data in 48 languages from 15,929 participants in 84 countries, we experimentally tested the effects of message framing on COVID-19 related judgments, intentions, and feelings. Loss (vs. gain) framed messages increased self reported anxiety among participants cross nationally with little to no impact on policy attitudes, behavioral intentions, or information seeking relevant to pandemic risks. These results were consistent across 84 countries, three variations of the message framing wording, and 560 data processing and analytic choices. Thus, results provide an empirical answer to a global communication question and highlight the emotional toll of loss-framed messages. Critically, this work demonstrates the importance of considering unintended affective consequences when evaluating nudge style interventions.
Details
- Title
- In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries
- Authors
- Charles A Dorison (Corresponding Author) - Northwestern UniversityJennifer S Lerner (Author) - Harvard UniversityBlake H. Heller (Author) - Harvard UniversityAlexander J. Rothman (Author) - University of Minnesota SystemIchiro I. Kawachi (Author) - Harvard UniversityKe Wang (Author) - Harvard UniversityVaughan W. Rees (Author) - Harvard UniversityBrian P. Gill (Author)Nancy Gibbs (Author) - Harvard UniversityCharles R Ebersole (Author) - University of VirginiaSee article full text for full list of authors (Author)Barnaby J W Dixson (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Health and Behavioural Sciences - Legacy
- Publication details
- Affective Science, Vol.3(3), pp.577-602
- Publisher
- Springer Cham
- DOI
- 10.1007/s42761-022-00128-3
- ISSN
- 2662-205X
- PMID
- 36185503
- Organisation Unit
- School of Health and Behavioural Sciences - Legacy; Australian Centre for Pacific Islands Research; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Health - Psychology
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99678892002621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
6 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Industry collaboration
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Psychology
- Psychology, Experimental
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites