Logo image
Implementing digital self-guided mental health programs for LGBTQA+ people in Australia: barriers and recommendations from Australian healthcare providers
   

Implementing digital self-guided mental health programs for LGBTQA+ people in Australia: barriers and recommendations from Australian healthcare providers

James A. Fowler, Lisa Buckley, Shelley Viskovich, Miranda Muir Judith A. Dean
Australian Psychologist, Vol.Advanced access
10-Jun-2026

(1)

pdf
Implementing digital self-guided mental health programs for LGBTQA people in Australia barriers and recommendations from Australian healthcare provi866.26 kB
Published Version (Advanced Access) Open Access
digital mental health healthcare provider implementation intervention LGBTQA+ online survey
Objective Little is known about healthcare providers’ (HCPs) experiences implementing digital self-guided mental health programs within their services for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, asexual and other sexual, romantic and gender minority identities (LGBTQA+) people. This work aims to understand HCPs’ perceptions of barriers, facilitators and recommendations for implementing digital self-guided mental health programs within LGBTQA+ contexts. Methods An online survey was disseminated to HCPs with experience providing care to LGBTQA+ people in Australia. Data were analysed descriptively and using inductive qualitative conventional content analysis of open-ended items. Results The most common barrier to implementation revolved around client accessibility (47, 52.2%) – often described as the impact of technology access, living with a disability and having a safe place to complete programs. Facilitators of implementation often involved supporting integration into clinical care through training (49, 43.8%) and providing information on programs available (17, 15.2%). Conclusion Our results suggest that HCPs have few logistical barriers regarding the implementation of programs, but programs need to be carefully designed to be accessible and safe for LGBTQA+ end-users. These findings within an LGBTQA+ context mirror findings within other populations, highlighting the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to maximise implementation alongside community-led program design.
1
Logo image