Logo image
Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes

Ava Kerr, Gary J Slater and Nuala Byrne
British Journal of Nutrition, Vol.117(4), pp.591-601
2017
PMID: 28382898
pdf
PDF - Published Version576.89 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517000551View
Published Version

Abstract

body composition assessment fat-free mass fat mass air displacement plethysmography dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy surface anthropometry
Two, three and four compartment (2C, 3C and 4C) models of body composition are popular methods to measure fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in athletes. However, the impact of food and fluid intake on measurement error has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate standardised (overnight fasted, rested and hydrated) v. non-standardised (afternoon and non-fasted) presentation on technical and biological error on surface anthropometry (SA), 2C, 3C and 4C models. In thirty-two athletic males, measures of SA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) and air displacement plethysmography (BOD POD) were taken to establish 2C, 3C and 4C models. Tests were conducted after an overnight fast (duplicate), about 7 h later after ad libitum food and fluid intake, and repeated 24 h later before and after ingestion of a specified meal. Magnitudes of changes in the mean and typical errors of measurement were determined. Mean change scores for non-standardised presentation and post meal tests for FM were substantially large in BIS, SA, 3C and 4C models. For FFM, mean change scores for non-standardised conditions produced large changes for BIS, 3C and 4C models, small for DXA, trivial for BOD POD and SA. Models that included a total body water (TBW) value from BIS (3C and 4C) were more sensitive to TBW changes in non-standardised conditions than 2C models. Biological error is minimised in all models with standardised presentation but DXA and BOD POD are acceptable if acute food and fluid intake remains below 500 g.

Details

Metrics

40 File views/ downloads
629 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Nutrition & Dietetics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Logo image