Logo image
Geometry and Constraint Dependent Energy Absorption and Mechanical Responses of Finite Elastomeric 3D-Printed Auxetic Structures
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Geometry and Constraint Dependent Energy Absorption and Mechanical Responses of Finite Elastomeric 3D-Printed Auxetic Structures

John Millar, David Alonso-Caneiro, Umer Izhar and Damon Kent
International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, Vol.9(4), pp.454-468
2026
pdf
1-s2.0-S2588840425001106-main617.52 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0

Abstract

3d Printing (Fused Deposition Modelling) Auxetic Metamaterials Boundary Constraint Effects Compressive Mechanical Response Geometric Aspect Ratio Re-entrant Chiral Geometry Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU)
Auxetic structures, characterised by negative Poisson’s ratios, exhibit exceptional energy absorption and controlled deformation making them ideal for applications in soft robotics, wearable sensors, biomedical devices, and structural monitoring. This study investigates the mechanical behaviour of novel hybrid re-entrant chiral geometry structures utilising re-entrant arms that facilitate chiral rotation during deformation. The hybrid re-entrant chiral auxetic structures fabricated from thermoplastic polyurethane, focusing on influence of geometric aspect ratio and boundary constraints on the compression deformation responses. Small-scale finite 2x2 cell array auxetic structures were investigated to provide insights into edge-dominated deformation responses critical to structures with constrained dimensions such as wearable sensors and soft robotics. Five structural variants with constant material volume and aspect ratios ranging from 0.83 to 1.33 were fabricated by fused deposition modelling. Compression testing and structural modelling revealed substantial dependence of the mechanical properties, including stiffness, buckling, and energy absorption, on the aspect ratio and boundary conditions. The lowest aspect ratio (0.83) structure maintained linear elasticity to 1.25% strain without constraint, reducing to 0.50% with constraint. Conversely, the highest aspect ratio (1.33) structure had reduced elastic strain capacity (0.30%) due to more prominent axial stiffening. Constrained specimens had higher initial stiffness, increasing from 6 kPa to 14.1 kPa as aspect ratio was increased from 0.83 to 1.33, while equivalent counterparts without boundary constraints ranged from 2.8 kPa to 8.7 kPa. For lower aspect ratio designs, the specific energy absorption was up to 180% higher at 30% strain with the constraints. Energy absorption was diminished for higher aspect ratio designs due to greater influence of geometric stiffening. The findings provide new insights into coupled effects from geometry and constraints on mechanical responses to guide design of auxetic structures for small-scale flexible load-bearing devices.

Details

Metrics

3 File views/ downloads
9 Record Views
Logo image