Logo image
Back
Gender equality in academia: Intentions and consequences
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Gender equality in academia: Intentions and consequences

Stina Powell
International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, Vol.18(1), pp.19-35
2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9532/CGP/V18I01/19-35
url
https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9532/CGP/V18I01/19-35View
Published Version

Abstract

Political Science Social Work Sociology gender equality measures academia review article meritocracy
Gender inequality persists in academia. This review article examines how universities around the world act on gender inequalities through gender equality measures. The analytical hypothesis is that gender equality measures are a response to how problems of inequality are understood and, as such, they also reveal why inequalities are sustained in academia. A wide variety of approaches are in use, but this article focuses on three of the most common: gender mainstreaming, affirmative action, and mentoring programs. The review recognized a global pattern of gender discrimination in academia as well as differences between countries and disciplines. The article departs from a critical gender-equality approach provided by current feminist research. It concludes that gender equality measures focus mainly on women and men, ignoring intersecting categories of discrimination, and that weaknesses in implementing meritocratic practices play a key role in upholding inequalities. The article suggests that critical feminist knowledge can help lead the way toward more challenging perspectives on gender equality in academia, in which relations of power, local and national contextualizations, as well as intersecting categories of discrimination can be made visible.

Details

Metrics

585 Record Views
Logo image