Logo image
Gatekeeping and gate-opening: Ethical and reflexive research with LESLLA stakeholders: A response to "Why should I care? Research ethics in the field of adult L2 literacy"
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Gatekeeping and gate-opening: Ethical and reflexive research with LESLLA stakeholders: A response to "Why should I care? Research ethics in the field of adult L2 literacy"

Eva Malessa, Skye Playsted, Jemima Rillera Kempster and Live Grinden
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol.15, pp.1-9
2026
pdf
DuJAL24695_text176.42 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0

Abstract

adult literacy informed consent LESLLA reflexivity research ethics
With their self-reflective article and vignettes, Shepperd and Dalderop provide valuable insights into their personal quest for ethical and reflexive research and make an important contribution to research ethics in applied linguistics. In our viewpoint, we would like to elaborate on their reflections on informed consent and voluntary participation by providing our thoughts on potential gate-openers/ gate-opening in LESLLA research. Their article considers three core areas of ethical care (consent, participation and minimising harm while optimising beneficence) to be exercised in LESLLA research and frames these as “layers of vulnerability” (see Luna, 2019). Similarly to Shepperd and Dalderop, we navigated these layers of vulnerability in our individual LESLLA research contexts in Norway (Live), Australia (Skye and Jemima) and Finland (Eva) through various institutional and research gatekeepers and will discuss relevant personal and contextualized reflections of our own in this viewpoint.

Details

Metrics

3 Record Views
Logo image