Logo image
Factors Influencing Health Care Workers’ Willingness to Respond to Duty during Infectious Disease Outbreaks and Bioterrorist Events: An Integrative Review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Factors Influencing Health Care Workers’ Willingness to Respond to Duty during Infectious Disease Outbreaks and Bioterrorist Events: An Integrative Review

Eleanor J Murray, Matthew Mason, Vanessa Sparke and Peta-Anne Zimmerman
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, Vol.36(3), pp.321-337
2021
PMCID: PMC7948100
PMID: 33618789
pdf
Factors Influencing Health Care Workers’ Willingness to Respond to Duty during Infectious Disease Outbreaks and Bioterrorist Events - An Integrative R431.43 kBDownloadView
Open Access CC BY-NC-SA V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X21000248View
Published Version

Abstract

bioterrorism health care workers infectious disease emergency infectious disease outbreak willingness to respond coronavirus disease 2019 Emergency Medical Services emergency medical technician health care worker Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome Mixed Methods Assessment Tool nongovernment organization personal protective equipment Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Background: Infectious disease emergencies are increasingly becoming part of the health care delivery landscape, having implications to not only individuals and the public, but also on those expected to respond to these emergencies. Health care workers (HCWs) are perhaps the most important asset in an infectious disease emergency, yet these individuals have their own barriers and facilitators to them being willing or able to respond. Aim: The purpose of this review was to identify factors affecting HCW willingness to respond (WTR) to duty during infectious disease outbreaks and/or bioterrorist events. Methods: An integrative literature review methodology was utilized to conduct a structured search of the literature including CINAHL, Medline, Embase, and PubMed databases using key terms and phrases. PRISMA guidelines were used to report the search outcomes and all eligible literature was screened with those included in the final review collated and appraised using a quality assessment tool. Results: A total of 149 papers were identified from the database search. Forty papers were relevant following screening, which highlighted facilitators of WTR to include: availability of personal protective equipment (PPE)/vaccine, level of training, professional ethics, family and personal safety, and worker support systems. A number of barriers were reported to prevent WTR for HCWs, such as: concern and perceived risk, interpersonal factors, job-level factors, and outbreak characteristics. Conclusions: By comprehensively identifying the facilitators and barriers to HCWs’ WTR during infectious disease outbreaks and/or bioterrorist events, strategies can be identified and implemented to improve WTR and thus improve HCW and public safety.

Details

Metrics

9 File views/ downloads
80 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Emergency Medicine

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image