Files and links (1)
Published VersionCC BY-NC V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
Exploration of the clinical exercise physiologist standards in the UK: are they fit for purpose and how could they be developed?
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, Vol.12(1), pp.1-14
2026
PMID: 41835329
Abstract
Registered clinical exercise physiologists (CEPs) are recognised healthcare professionals in the UK and are registered through the Academy of Healthcare Science (AHCS). Their practice is guided by the Clinical Exercise Physiology UK (CEP-UK) standards outlined in their scope of practice and the accompanying curriculum framework. This study aimed to explore the current CEP standards and understand if they are fit for purpose in the UK. Three phases (1) a scoping review of Medline, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. A survey was phased (2) using a 1–5 rating Likert scale ranking the importance of each component for a UK CEP. Phase (3) consisted of two focus groups to gain a consensus on the current standards and recommendations for future iterations. Overall, academics (n=26), healthcare professionals (n=25), CEPs (n=10), service managers (n=6) and researchers (n=4) were identified through purposive sampling and snowball sampling. Phase (1) identified 24 studies containing relevant knowledge and skills. During phase (2), n=58 (82%) of participants completed the survey and n=25 (35%) attended focus groups in phase (3). All knowledge and skills identified from the scoping review, the CEP-UK scope of practice, curriculum framework and the AHCS standards of proficiency and good clinical practice (n=58) were accepted. For CEP practice, an additional three health conditions were accepted from the previous iteration into the current health condition categories. A knowledge and understanding of nine key health professions was also recommended. The final consensus identified that 58 key knowledge and skills across the current health condition categories were required by CEPs, meaning that the current CEP-UK curriculum framework is fit for purpose with only minimal changes required for the next iteration.
Details
- Title
- Exploration of the clinical exercise physiologist standards in the UK: are they fit for purpose and how could they be developed?
- Authors
- Anthony Crozier (Corresponding Author) - Liverpool John Moores UniversityConnor Osin - Liverpool John Moores UniversityIan Sadler - Liverpool John Moores UniversityLee E F Graves - Liverpool John Moores UniversityJoanna Rycroft - Liverpool John Moores UniversityEllen Dawson - Liverpool John Moores UniversityGemma Miller - Liverpool John Moores UniversityDaniel J Green - The University of Western AustraliaLouise Naylor - The University of Western AustraliaChristopher David Askew - University of the Sunshine CoastHelen Jones - Liverpool John Moores University
- Publication details
- BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, Vol.12(1), pp.1-14
- Publisher
- BMJ Group
- Date published
- 2026
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-003066
- ISSN
- 2055-7647
- PMID
- 41835329
- Copyright note
- © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
- Data Availability
- The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- Grant note
- This research was funded by Research England International Investment Initiative funding (i-CARDIO).
- Organisation Unit
- Healthy Ageing Research Cluster; Cancer Research Cluster; School of Health - Sports & Exercise Science
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 991217260502621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
1 Record Views