Logo image
Examining the impact of forest protection status on firewood sufficiency in rural Africa
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Examining the impact of forest protection status on firewood sufficiency in rural Africa

J E Latham, S M Sallu, R Loveridge and Andrew R Marshall
Environmental Conservation, Vol.44(3), pp.221-233
2017
pdf
PDF - Author's Accepted Version468.05 kBDownloadView
Accepted VersionPDF - Author Accepted Version Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000066View
Published Version

Abstract

participatory forest management (PFM) nontimber forest products (NTFPs) landscape approach payments for ecosystem services (PES) REDD+ wellbeing
Millions of people living in poverty depend on non-timber forest products (NTFPs), yet forest protection causes displacement, replacement or reduction of NTFP extraction activities, with implications for human welfare. Here, we assess the impact of forest protection on a novel measure of wellbeing that incorporates both objective and subjective components of people's lives. In five villages near forests with mixed protection status in Tanzania, household perceived need for firewood is compared with actual consumption in order to provide a simple metric of firewood sufficiency. Firewood sufficiency varied with forest protection status, with non-compliance inferred by household ability to meet firewood needs despite forest access restrictions. Fuel-efficient stove ownership improved the perceived ability to meet firewood needs; however, actual consumption remained unchanged. Firewood sufficiency was significantly lower for those sourcing firewood outside forests, and increased household awareness of the management authority significantly reduced firewood consumption. In a forest landscape of mixed protection status, pressure will likely be displaced to the forest with the least active management authority, affecting their efficiency as non-extractive reserves. Our findings reinforce the need for a landscape approach to forest management planning that accounts for local needs, to avoid leakage to other less well-protected forests and detriment to household welfare. Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017

Details

Metrics

78 File views/ downloads
757 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Biodiversity Conservation
Environmental Sciences

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#1 No Poverty
#2 Zero Hunger
#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image