Logo image
Back
Evidence-based guidelines for intrapartum maternal hydration assessment and management: A scoping review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evidence-based guidelines for intrapartum maternal hydration assessment and management: A scoping review

Lauren Kearney, Alison Craswell, Nellie Dick, Debbie Massey and Rachael Nugent
Birth, Vol.51(2), pp.253-263
2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12773
PMID: 37803945
Appears in  UniSC Diversity and Inclusion Research Collection
pdf
Evidence-based guidelines for intrapartum maternal hydration assessment and management A scoping review1.15 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12773View
Published Version

Abstract

birth clinical variation fasting in labor hydration hyponatremia intrapartum care intravenous therapy labor labor and birth management or care UniSC Diversity Area - Life Stages
Problem: Inconsistent practice relating to intrapartum hydration assessment and management is reported, and potential harm exists for laboring women and birthing persons. Background: Labor and birth are physically demanding, and adequate nutrition and hydration are essential for labor progress. A lack of clear consensus on intrapartum hydration assessment and management during labor and birth currently exists. In addition, there is an inconsistent approach to managing hydration, often including a mixture of intravenous and oral fluids that are poorly monitored. Aim: The aim of this scoping review was to identify and collate evidence-based guidelines for intrapartum hydration assessment and management of maternal hydration during labor and birth. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched, in addition to professional college association websites. Inclusion criteria were intrapartum clinical guidelines in English, published in the last 10 years. Findings: Despite searching all appropriate databases in maternity care, we were unable to identify evidence-based guidelines specific to hydration assessment and management, therefore resulting in an "empty review." A subsequent review of general intrapartum care guidelines was undertaken. Our adapted review identified 12 guidelines, seven of which referenced the assessment and management of maternal hydration during labor and birth. Three guidelines recommend that "low-risk" women in spontaneous labor at term should hold determination over what they ingest in labor. No recommendations with respect to assessment and management of hydration for women undergoing induction of labor were found. Discussion: Despite the increasing use of intravenous fluid as an adjunct to oral intake to maintain maternal intrapartum hydration, there is limited evidence and, subsequently, guidelines to determine best practice in this area. How hydration is assessed was also largely absent from general intrapartum care guidelines, further perpetuating potential clinical variation in this area. Conclusion: There is an absence of guidelines specific to the assessment and management of maternal hydration during labor and birth, despite its importance in ensuring labor progress and safe care.

Details

Metrics

3 File views/ downloads
81 Record Views
4 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Nursing
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Pediatrics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image