Logo image
Back
Evidence-Based Recommendation Of A Powered Knee For Transfemoral Bone-Anchored Prostheses: A Cross-Sectional Study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Evidence-Based Recommendation Of A Powered Knee For Transfemoral Bone-Anchored Prostheses: A Cross-Sectional Study

Laurent Frossard, Stefan Laux, Marta Geada, Lisa Tronicke, Thor Fridriksson and Knut Lechler
Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journals, Vol.8(2), pp.1-35
2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v8i2.45790
PMID: 41245905
pdf
EVIDENCE-BASED+RECOMMENDATION+OF+A+POWERED+KNEE+FOR+TRANSFEMORAL+BONE-ANCHORED+PROSTHESES5.05 MBDownloadView
Published VersionCC BY V4.0,  Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v8i2.45790View
Published VersionCC BY V4.0,  Open

Abstract

amputation artificial limbs bionics kinetics loading bone-anchored prosthesis lower limb prosthesis Osseointegrated Implant microprocessor-controlled knees
BACKGROUND: A transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis (TF-BAP) can be fitted with non-microprocessor-controlled knees (N-MPKs), or with microprocessor-controlled knees, which can be passive (P-MPKs) or active (A-MPKs). The next generation of A-MPKs, including powered knees, is emerging. The understanding of the loading applied on TF-BAP fitted with these A-MPKs is limited. OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study aimed to characterize the load applied on instrumented TF-BAP fitted with an A-MPK (Power Knee, Össur, Iceland) during standardized daily activities. Furthermore, some load characteristics applied during walking were compared with TF-BAP fitted with N-MPK and P-MPK reported in the literature using similar approach. METHODOLOGY: Thirteen males fitted with a transfemoral press-fit osseointegrated implant participated in this study between 2021 and 2022. Forces and moments applied on the instrumented TF-BAP, fitted with a Power Knee (PKA01) and Pro-Flex (LP, XC) or Balance S feet (ÖSSUR, Iceland), were measured wirelessly using an iPecsLab (RTC Electronics, USA) during walking, ascending and descending ramp and stairs. We followed a 28-step process to characterize the loading pattern considering spatiotemporal gaits variables as well as loading boundaries and extrema. FINDINGS: Overall, 1,327 steps were analyzed. The cadence ranged between 34 ± 6 and 49 ± 13 strides/min. The maximum forces and moments recorded on the long, anteroposterior and mediolateral axes of the transducer were 1,258 N, 331 N and 234 N as well as 19 Nm, 74 Nm and 91 Nm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Power Knee, combined with Pro-Flex or Balance S feet, may improve participants’ capacity to ambulate. Comparations with reference values indicated that transitions from N-MPKs or P-MPKs to the Power Knee are considered safe and likely to improve efficiency. This study contributed to evidence-based recommendations of TF-BAP fitted with powered knees. Hopefully, this work will advance clinical practice guidelines for the growing population choosing bionic solutions.

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image