Logo image
Estimating the change in life expectancy after a diagnosis of cancer among the Australian population
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Estimating the change in life expectancy after a diagnosis of cancer among the Australian population

P D Baade, D R Youlden, T M L Andersson, Philippa H Youl, Michael G Kimlin, J F Aitken and R J Biggar
BMJ Open, Vol.5(4), e006740
2015
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)734.02 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access)CC BY-NC V4.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006740View
Published Version

Abstract

Objectives: Communication of relevant prognostic information is critical in helping patients understand the implications of their cancer diagnosis. We describe measures of prognosis to help communicate relevant prognostic information to improve patients' understanding of the implications of their cancer diagnosis. Setting: Australia-wide population-based cancer registry cohort. Participants: 870 878 patients aged 15-89 years diagnosed with invasive cancer between 1990 and 2007, with mortality follow-up information to December 2010. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Flexible parametric models were used to estimate loss of life expectancy (LOLE), remaining life expectancy (RLE) and 10-year cumulative probability of cancer-specific death (1-relative survival). Results: On average, Australians diagnosed with cancer at age 40 years faced losing an average of 11.2 years of life (95% CI 11.1 to 11.4) due to their cancer, while those diagnosed at 80 years faced losing less, an average of 3.9 years (3.9 to 4.0) because of higher competing mortality risks. In contrast, younger people had lower estimated cumulative probabilities of cancer-specific death within 10 years (40 years: 21.5%, 21.4% to 22.1%) compared with older people (80 years: 55.4%, 55.0% to 55.9%). The patterns for individual cancers varied widely, both by cancer type and by age within cancer type. Conclusions: The LOLE and RLE measures provide complementary messages to standard relative survival estimates (expressed here in terms of cumulative probability of cancer-specific death). Importantly, relative survival per se underplays the greater absolute impact that a cancer diagnosis has at a younger age on LOLE. When presented in isolation for all cancers, it may provide a misleading impression of future mortality burden of cancer overall, and furthermore, it will obscure patterns of mortality by type and by age data within type. Alternative measures of LOLE, therefore, provide important communication about mortality risk to patients with cancer worldwide and should be incorporated into standard reporting and dissemination strategies. © 2015, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Details

Metrics

27 File views/ downloads
357 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Oncology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Logo image