Logo image
Efficacy of exercise interventions for women during and after gynaecological cancer treatment - a systematic scoping review
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Efficacy of exercise interventions for women during and after gynaecological cancer treatment - a systematic scoping review

Grace Laura Rose, Elizabeth Mary Stewart, Briana Kristine Clifford, Tom George Bailey, Alexandra Jane Rush, Claudia Rose Abbott, Sandra Christine Hayes, Andreas Obermair and Alexandra Leigh McCarthy
Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol.31(6), pp.1-13
2023
PMCID: PMC10191940
PMID: 37195433
Appears in  UniSC Supported Open Access Outputs
pdf
Efficacy of exercise interventions for women during and after gynaecological cancer treatment – a systematic scoping review850.39 kBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY V4.0
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07790-8View
Published Version

Abstract

strength body composition oncology agility fitness
Purpose: To systematically synthesise evidence of exercise intervention efficacy for physical/psychosocial outcomes that matter to women during/following treatment for gynaecological cancer. Methods: Five databases were searched (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Scopus). Exercise-only intervention studies that included women during/ following treatment for any gynaecological cancer, with or without control comparison, on any physical or psychosocial outcome(s), were included and qualitatively appraised using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs), three single-arm pre-post studies, and one prospective cohort study satisfied were included (11 studies). Most studies were completed following treatment (91%), included combined (aerobic and resistance; 36%) and aerobic (36%) training, were fully/mostly (63%) unsupervised, and had a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Overall, 33 outcomes (64% objectively measured) were assessed. Improvements were observed in aerobic capacity (VȮ 2 Peak +1.6 mL/kg/min, 6-minute walk distance +20-27 m), lower- (30-second sit-to-stand +2-4 repetitions) and upper-limb strength (30-second arm curl +5 repetitions; 1RM grip strength/chest press +2.4-3.1 kg), and agility (timed up-and-go -0.6 seconds). However, changes in quality of life, anthropometry/body composition, balance and flexibility were inconsistent. There was no evidence to support worsening of outcomes. Conclusion: Preliminary research into the role of exercise post-gynaecological cancer suggests an improvement in exercise capacity, muscular strength, and agility which, in the absence of exercise, typically decline following gynaecological cancer. Future exercise trials involving larger and more diverse gynaecological cancer samples will improve understanding of the potential and magnitude of effect of guideline recommended exercise on outcomes that matter to patients.

Details

Metrics

87 File views/ downloads
53 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Oncology
Rehabilitation

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image