Logo image
Determining the value of multiple ecosystem services in terms of community wellbeing: Who should be the valuing agent?
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Determining the value of multiple ecosystem services in terms of community wellbeing: Who should be the valuing agent?

Simone Maynard, David James and A Davidson
Ecological Economics, Vol.115, pp.22-28
2015
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.002View
Published Version

Abstract

regional planning multiple ecosystem services ecosystem services framework valuation community wellbeing
When multiple ecosystem services are derived from multiple ecosystems across different policy, planning or management jurisdictions, questions arise regarding the valuation of ecosystem services such as: who are the beneficiaries; how do they value ecosystem services; and who should be the valuing agent? In attempting to achieve an integrated approach to natural resource management in South East Queensland (SEQ), stakeholders have combined their knowledge to develop a framework to identify, measure and value ecosystem services provided by the region. This paper focuses on a methodology trialled to value the ecosystem services derived from the SEQ region in terms of the wellbeing of the SEQ community. The methodology allows flexibility of choice regarding whose values count and who should be the valuing agent. The methodology was trialled with community participants and scientific experts. The building blocks of the Framework can be used to construct different model variants, each of which reveals key characteristics of ecosystem services in SEQ. The approach adopted to value ecosystems and ecosystem services offers scope for decision makers to think more broadly about possible impacts of decisions on the wellbeing of the community and has facilitated the inclusion of ecosystem services in statutory planning policy in SEQ.

Details

Metrics

11 File views/ downloads
1110 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Ecology
Economics
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#2 Zero Hunger
#6 Clean Water and Sanitation
#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
#13 Climate Action
#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image