Logo image
Desired Chinese medicine practitioner capabilities and professional development needs: A survey of registered practitioners in Victoria, Australia
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Desired Chinese medicine practitioner capabilities and professional development needs: A survey of registered practitioners in Victoria, Australia

C C Xue, W Zhou, A L Zhang, Ken Greenwood, C Da Costa, A Radloff, V Lin and D F Story
BMC Health Services Research, Vol.8, 27
2008
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)222.78 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access)CCBY_V2.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-27View
Published Version

Abstract

professional development Chinese medicine curriculum design bachelor degree communication capability
Background. The State of Victoria in Australia introduced Chinese medicine practitioner registration in 2000 and issued its education guidelines in late 2002 for introduction in 2005. This study obtained practitioners' views on desired capabilities for competent Chinese medicine practice and to identify professional development needs. Methods. A questionnaire, consisting of 28 predefined capabilities in four categories with a rating scale of importance from one to five, was developed and sent to all registered Chinese medicine practitioners in the State of Victoria, Australia in October, 2005. Results. Two hundreds and twenty eight completed questionnaires were returned which represented a response rate of 32.5%. Of the four categories of capabilities, technical capabilities were considered to be the most important for clinical practice. Specifically, the ability to perform acupuncture treatment and/or dispense an herbal prescription was ranked the highest. In contrast, research and information management capabilities were considered the least important. The educational background of practitioners appeared to be an important factor influencing their rating of capabilities. Significantly, nearly double the number of practitioners with Australian qualifications than practitioners trained overseas valued communication as an important capability. For continuing professional education, clinical skills courses were considered as a priority while research degree studies were not. Conclusion. Registered Chinese medicine practitioners viewed skills training as important but did not support the need for research and information management training. This represents a significant hurdle to developing Chinese medicine as a form of evidence-based healthcare. © 2008 Xue et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Details

Metrics

12 File views/ downloads
326 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

Source: InCites

Logo image