Logo image
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the spine functional index

Eda Tonga, Charles P Gabel, Sedef Karayazgan and Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, Vol.13, 30
2015
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)1.35 MBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0219-3View
Published Version

Abstract

spine outcome Turkish validity reliability factor analysis
Background: The Spine Functional Index (SFI) is a patient reported outcome measure with sound clinimetric properties and clinical viability for the determination of whole-spine impairment. To date, no validated Turkish version is available. The purpose of this study is to cross-culturally adapted the SFI for Turkish-speaking patients (SFI-Tk) and determine the psychometric properties of reliability, validity and factor structure in a Turkish population with spine musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: The SFI English version was culturally adapted and translated into Turkish using a double forward and backward method according to established guidelines. Patients (n= 285, cervical = l29, lumbar = 151, cervical and lumbar region= 5, 73% female, age 45±1) with spine musculoskeletal disorders completed the SFI-Tk at baseline and after a seven day period for test-retest reliability. For criterion validity the Turkish version of the Functional Rating Index (FRI) was used plus the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for cervical patients and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for back patients. Additional psychometric properties were determined for internal consistency (Chronbach's α), criterion validity and factor structure. Results: There was a high degree of internal consistency (α = 0.85, item range 0.80-0.88) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.93, item range = 0.75-0.95). The factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor solution explaining 24.2% of total variance. Criterion validity with the ODI was high (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) while the FRI and NDI were fair (r = 0.52 and r = 0.58, respectively). The SFI-Tk showed no missing responses with the 'half-mark' option used in 11.75% of total responses by 77.9% of participants. Measurement error from SEM and MDC90 were respectively 2.96% and 7.12%. Conclusions: The SFI-Tk demonstrated a one-factor solution and is a reliable and valid instrument. The SFI-Tk consists of simple and easily understood wording and may be used to assess spine region musculoskeletal disorders in Turkish speaking patients.

Details

Metrics

41 File views/ downloads
955 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image