Logo image
Continuing major inconsistencies in the classification of unexpected infant deaths
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Continuing major inconsistencies in the classification of unexpected infant deaths

Roger W Byard, Rebecca A Shipstone and Jeanine Young
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Vol.64, pp.20-22
2019
PMID: 30897532
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.03.007View
Published Version

Abstract

The classification of the cause of unexpected infant deaths by both pathologists and researchers may be quite inconsistent. For example, if an infant is found lying face down on soft bedding the death may still be certified as 'sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)', 'accidental suffocation', 'undetermined', 'unclassified sudden infant death (USID)', or 'sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI)'. As the San Diego definition of SIDS does not appear to be rigorously or consistently applied, clarifying 'mechanical asphyxia not determined with certainty' may help to more clearly separate SIDS from USID. Including a classification algorithm with the definition may also help to better define unsafe sleep factors and suffocation. This commentary reviews the current situation with regard to classifying these deaths and concludes that the absence of diagnostic pathological markers with conflicting classification systems has led to idiosyncratic certification practices.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Medicine, Legal

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image