Continued challenges in the policy and legal framework for collaborative water planning

P L Tan; K Bowmer; Claudia Baldwin

doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.021

Back

Continued challenges in the policy and legal framework for collaborative water planning

Journal article

Peer reviewed

Continued challenges in the policy and legal framework for collaborative water planning

P L Tan, K Bowmer and Claudia Baldwin

Journal of Hydrology, Vol.474, pp.84-91

2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.021

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.021View

Published Version

Abstract

water planning

law and policy

socio-economic analysis

stakeholder engagement

deliberative processes

conflict management

We consider the implementation of Australian water reform over the last two decades and into the future. Reform was to provide security for consumptive users and adequate rights for the environment. Overallocation, a key threat to both these aims, continues to challenge planners particularly in the Murray-Darling Basin and cannot be addressed without community support. We draw from four major studies to provide insights on how implementation needs to be underpinned by theory. From the perspective of institutional design for collaborative and sustainable water planning, seven major improvements are required: (1) Provision of detailed policy guidelines to support general legal requirements, particularly practical advice for interpreting and applying the precautionary principle. (2) Tools to identify and engage unorganised or neglected community sectors, for example Indigenous peoples and youth. (3) Procedural fairness and transparent decision making, to build confidence in reform; use of independent experts and visual tools to improve the quality of discussion and increase the acceptability of trade-offs. (4) Clearer documentation and language in planning, as more litigation is likely. (5) In accord with international literature, the development of comprehensive policy and legislative framework allowing a systems approach to consensus building, especially when the science is contested. (6) Information on exactly how much water is required and where, by capturing societal choices on environmental assets. (7) Planning for sustainable contraction where cutbacks to water use is required, as an additional strategy to the current emphasis on buying water or building infrastructure. In summary we advocate collaborative water planning processes to engender community confidence in planning.

Details

Title: Continued challenges in the policy and legal framework for collaborative water planning
Authors: P L Tan (Author) - Griffith University
K Bowmer (Author) - Charles Sturt University
Claudia Baldwin (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast - Faculty of Arts and Business
Publication details: Journal of Hydrology, Vol.474, pp.84-91
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Date published: 2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.021
ISSN: 0022-1694
Organisation Unit: School of Social Sciences - Legacy; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; Engage Research Lab; School of Law and Society; Sustainability Research Cluster
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99450273002621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

8 File views/ downloads

724 Record Views

30 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types: Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas: Engineering, Civil; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites