Logo image
Constructions of Impartiality in Mediation
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Constructions of Impartiality in Mediation

Susan Douglas
Journal of Judicial Administration, Vol.26(4), pp.232-247
2017
pdf
PDF - Published Version124.00 kBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version Open Access
url
http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/journal-of-judicial-administration/View
Webpage

Abstract

Law
Impartiality is a core principle of decision-making within Australia's common law system of justice. This article reports on an empirical study of the meaning of impartiality in mediation. The study is set against changes to the National Mediator Accreditation System in 2015, which saw removal of neutrality as an ethical requirement of practice. Prior to the 2015 amendments, mediators were required to demonstrate an understanding of "neutrality and impartiality". The requirement to demonstrate understanding of impartiality was retained in the 2015 revisions. The past requirement that mediators understand both neutrality and impartiality suggests that these two concepts are separate and distinct. Yet while some scholars distinguish between them, others treat them as synonymous. The study reported here sought to further understanding of impartiality by gathering data from practising mediators about what meaning they ascribe to impartiality and how they translate it into their practice. The results challenge existing constructions of impartiality that are framed from a purely legal perspective and suggest multidisciplinary influences consistent with non-adversarial justice approaches.

Details

Metrics

297 File views/ downloads
598 Record Views
Logo image