Journal article
Comparison of the productivity, cost and stem breakage of two- and three-machine harvest systems clearfelling a mature Pinus radiata stand
Australian Forestry, Vol.83(2), pp.91-98
2020
Abstract
Damage to trees and logs during harvest and transport can result in major losses of wood volume and value. The study compared a harvester/forwarder (two-machine) harvest system, which typically is used in Australia, with a feller-buncher/processor/forwarder (three-machine) harvest system in terms of productivity, cost and felling stem breakage when clearfelling a 29-year-old Pinus radiata plantation in eastern Victoria, Australia. The study aimed to determine whether the three-machine harvest system reduced felling tree breakage while maintaining or improving on the productivity and delivered cost of the two-machine harvest system. The harvest systems were compared on adjacent sites (~1 ha each) using an elemental time study. Machine productivity was derived from cycle times using StanForD stem files to obtain merchantable tree volumes and forwarder load weights from the forwarder's onboard scales. The three-machine harvest system was more productive and resulted in considerably less felling stem breakage than the two-machine harvest system (two broken stems compared with 21 broken stems). However, it was approximately 41% more expensive than the two-machine harvest system in terms of cost per m 3 of logs delivered to roadside. Because chiplogs were cut from broken stem sections where possible, and it was unlikely that sawlog volume was lost through stem breakage (based on the minimum sawlog specifications and the length and large-end diameter of the broken stem sections), any financial losses resulting from the additional breakage in the two-machine harvest system were insignificant compared with the extra cost per m 3 of logs delivered for the three-machine harvest system.
Details
- Title
- Comparison of the productivity, cost and stem breakage of two- and three-machine harvest systems clearfelling a mature Pinus radiata stand
- Authors
- Martin Strandgard (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Forest Industries Research CentreR Mitchell (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Forest Industries Research Centre
- Publication details
- Australian Forestry, Vol.83(2), pp.91-98
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis Australasia
- DOI
- 10.1080/00049158.2020.1775379
- ISSN
- 2325-6087
- Organisation Unit
- Forest Research Institute; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; Forest Industries Research Centre
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99467306402621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
11 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Web Of Science research areas
- Forestry
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites