Files and links (2)
Published VersionCC BY V4.0, Open Access
Journal article
Comparison of clinicians' and researchers' ratings of proposed diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying-shopping disorder within a Delphi study
PLoS One, Vol.18(4), pp.1-15
2023
PMID: 37014876
Abstract
Diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying shopping disorder were recently proposed based on a Delphi consensus study including 138 experts from 35 countries. The present study represents a secondary analysis of those data. To provide further support for the validity of expert responses in the Delphi study, the sample was retrospectively divided into clinician and researcher subgroups. The two groups were compared with respect to demographic variables, their importance ratings of clinical features, possible diagnostic criteria, differential diagnoses and specifiers of compulsive buying shopping disorder. Researchers reported less years of treating/assessing individuals with compulsive buying shopping disorder and stated that they have treated/assessed individuals with compulsive buying shopping disorder less often in the last 12 months than clinicians. Responses from the two groups concerning the importance ratings of possible diagnostic criteria of compulsive buying shopping disorder converged with only few minor differences with small to moderate group effects. However, even for those criteria, the consensus threshold (≥75% agreement with the proposed criterion) was reached in both groups. The lack of differences in the responses of the two groups indicates good validity for the proposed diagnostic criteria. Future research should address the clinical applicability and diagnostic validity of the criteria.
Details
- Title
- Comparison of clinicians' and researchers' ratings of proposed diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying-shopping disorder within a Delphi study
- Authors
- Nora M Laskowski (Author) - Ruhr University BochumPatrick Trotzke (Author) - University of Duisburg-EssenKathina Ali (Author) - Flinders UniversityDan B Fassnacht (Author) - Flinders UniversityMike Kyrios (Author) - Flinders UniversityMichael Häder (Author) - Dresden University of TechnologyAstrid Müller (Corresponding Author) - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
- Publication details
- PLoS One, Vol.18(4), pp.1-15
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science
- Date published
- 2023
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0283978
- ISSN
- 1932-6203
- PMID
- 37014876
- Copyright note
- © 2023 Laskowski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Organisation Unit
- School of Health - Psychology
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99727712302621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
2 File views/ downloads
31 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Psychiatry
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites