Journal article
Coercive Diplomacy and the Iranian Nuclear Crisis
International Negotiation, Vol.26(2), pp.218-244
2021
Abstract
Coercive diplomacy was utilized by a coalition of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China and Germany (collectively known as the P5+1) to negotiate an end to the Iranian nuclear crisis from 2002–2013. Eventually, this approach culminated in the Geneva interim agreement and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in November 2013 and October 2015, respectively. This article charts the course of the P5+1’s coercive diplomacy efforts against Iran and demonstrates that coercive diplomacy pressured Iran to a point where the cost of continued resistance was too high to continue enduring. It shows that a combination of factors succeeded after 11 years of a coercive diplomacy strategy. These findings will have implications for policymaking and academia, as it is a rare illustration of successful, coalitional coercive diplomacy.
Details
- Title
- Coercive Diplomacy and the Iranian Nuclear Crisis
- Authors
- Benjamin Harris (Author) - University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, School of Social Sciences - Legacy
- Publication details
- International Negotiation, Vol.26(2), pp.218-244
- Publisher
- Brill - Nijhoff
- DOI
- 10.1163/15718069-BJA10008
- ISSN
- 1571-8069
- Organisation Unit
- University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Social Sciences - Legacy
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99482286802621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
50 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Web Of Science research areas
- International Relations
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites