Journal article
Broader perspective on ecosystem sustainability: Consequences for decision making
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol.110(23), pp.9201-9208
2013
Abstract
Although the concept of ecosystem sustainability has a long-term focus, it is often viewed from a static system perspective. Because most ecosystems are dynamic, we explore sustainability assessments from three additional perspectives: resilient systems; systems where tipping points occur; and systems subject to episodic resetting. Whereas foundations of ecosystem resilience originated in ecology, recent discussions have focused on geophysical attributes, and it is recognized that dynamic system components may not return to their former state following perturbations. Tipping points emerge when chronic changes (typically anthropogenic, but sometimes natural) push ecosystems to thresholds that cause collapse of process and function and may become permanent. Ecosystem resetting occurs when episodic natural disasters breach thresholds with little or no warning, resulting in long-term changes to environmental attributes or ecosystem function. An example of sustainability assessment of ecosystem goods and services along the Gulf Coast (USA) demonstrates the need to include both the resilient and dynamic nature of biogeomorphic components. Mountain road development in northwest Yunnan, China, makes rivers and related habitat vulnerable to tipping points. Ecosystems reset by natural disasters are also presented, emphasizing the need to understand the magnitude frequency and interrelationships among major disturbances, as shown by (i) the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and resulting tsunami, including how unsustainable urban development exacerbates geodisaster propagation, and (ii) repeated major earthquakes and associated geomorphic and vegetation disturbances in Papua New Guinea. Although all of these ecosystem perturbations and shifts are individually recognized, they are not embraced in contemporary sustainable decision making.
Details
- Title
- Broader perspective on ecosystem sustainability: Consequences for decision making
- Authors
- Roy C Sidle (Author) - Environmental Protection AgencyWilliam H Benson (Author) - National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory, United StatesJohn F Carriger (Author) - National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory, United StatesToshitaka Kamai (Author) - Kyoto University, Japan
- Publication details
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol.110(23), pp.9201-9208
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Date published
- 2013
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1302328110
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- Organisation Unit
- University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; Sustainability Research Cluster
- Language
- English
- Record Identifier
- 99449955202621
- Output Type
- Journal article
Metrics
2 File views/ downloads
528 Record Views
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- International collaboration
- Web Of Science research areas
- Environmental Sciences
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: InCites