Logo image
Blending landsat and MODIS data to generate multispectral indices: A comparison of "index-then-blend" and "Blend-Then-Index" approaches
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Blending landsat and MODIS data to generate multispectral indices: A comparison of "index-then-blend" and "Blend-Then-Index" approaches

Ben Jarihani, T R McVicar, T G van Niel, I V Emelyanova, J N Callow and K Johansen
Remote Sensing, Vol.6(10), pp.9213-9238
2014
pdf
PDF - Published Version (Open Access)4.14 MBDownloadView
Published VersionPDF - Published Version (Open Access)CC BY V4.0 Open Access
url
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6109213View
Published Version

Abstract

data fusion blending STARFM ESTARFM multispectral indices
The objective of this paper was to evaluate the accuracy of two advanced blending algorithms, Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (STARFM) and Enhanced Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (ESTARFM) to downscale Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) indices to the spatial resolution of Landsat. We tested two approaches: (i) "Index-then-Blend" (IB); and (ii) "Blend-then-Index" (BI) when simulating nine indices, which are widely used for vegetation studies, environmental moisture assessment and standing water identification. Landsat-like indices, generated using both IB and BI, were simulated on 45 dates in total from three sites. The outputs were then compared with indices calculated from observed Landsat data and pixel-to-pixel accuracy of each simulation was assessed by calculating the: (i) bias; (ii) R2; and (iii) Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD). The IB approach produced higher accuracies than the BI approach for both blending algorithms for all nine indices at all three sites. We also found that the relative performance of the STARFM and ESTARFM algorithms depended on the spatial and temporal variances of the Landsat-MODIS input indices. Our study suggests that the IB approach should be implemented for blending of environmental indices, as it was: (i) less computationally expensive due to blending single indices rather than multiple bands; (ii) more accurate due to less error propagation; and (iii) less sensitive to the choice of algorithm. © 2014 by the authors.

Details

Metrics

22 File views/ downloads
816 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Environmental Sciences
Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
Remote Sensing

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image