Logo image
Benchmarking the research track record and level of appointment of Australian occupational therapy academics
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Benchmarking the research track record and level of appointment of Australian occupational therapy academics

Kieran Broome and Marion Gray
Australian occupational therapy journal, Vol.64(5), pp.400-407
2017
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12387View
Published Version

Abstract

bibliometrics occupational therapy universities
Background: Academic faculty are active contributors to the evidence base of the profession. Little is known about the research productivity of Australian occupational therapy academics. Methods: A bibliographic analysis of Australian occupational therapy faculty websites and corresponding Scopus citation database profiles was conducted. A description of current research productivity benchmarks and relationships with holding a doctorate, academic appointment level and institutional characteristics were explored. Results: The median H-index of Clinical and Associate Lecturers was 0, 1 for Lecturers, 4 for Senior Lecturers, 7.5 for Associate Professors and 13 for Professors. The number of publications and number of citing documents follows a Pareto tendency, where 20% of researchers are responsible for around 80% of the research track record of Australian occupational therapy academics. Conclusion: The findings provide a benchmark for Australian occupational therapy faculty research track records and associations with appointment levels. This benchmark differs across countries and disciplines. The results raise considerations for enhancing the overall research track record of occupational therapy academics.

Details

Metrics

3 File views/ downloads
778 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Rehabilitation
Logo image