Logo image
Awareness, Use and Acceptability of Infant Behavioural Sleep Interventions: An Initial Exploration Among Caregivers Residing in Five Countries
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Awareness, Use and Acceptability of Infant Behavioural Sleep Interventions: An Initial Exploration Among Caregivers Residing in Five Countries

Jacy Hyland, Sarah Blunden, Sarah M Honaker, Perran Boran, Prudence Millear, Nalan Karabayır, Hatice Ezgi Barış, Meltem Dinleyici and Alexandra Metse
Journal of Sleep Research, Vol.35(4), pp.1-22
2026
PMCID: PMC13357938
PMID: 41633945
pdf
Hyland_et_al_InfantSleepInterventions_revised_July2025_AuthorAcceptedVersion701.24 kBDownloadView
Accepted Version Open Access

Abstract

Clinical and health psychology Applied and developmental psychology Public health Infant sleep sleep interventions acceptability cross-culture parental preferences
This study aimed to assess caregivers' awareness, use and acceptability of common infant behavioural sleep strategies/interventions and explore differences in awareness and acceptability based on country of residence. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with caregivers (n = 914) of infants aged between 6 and 18 months residing in Australia, Canada, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. Caregivers were provided descriptions of common infant behavioural sleep interventions and reported their awareness of, use, and level of acceptability (using a validated measure: the acceptability of intervention measure [AIM]) for each intervention. Awareness of interventions ranged from 50% to 70% of caregivers, with significant variability by country. Overall, 70% of caregivers had used at least one intervention, with usage rates varying from 25% to 80% depending on the intervention and 30% to 55% of caregivers ceasing use prematurely. Unmodified extinction (AIM = 2.12; 5 = high acceptability), parental presence (AIM = 2.75) and modified extinction (AIM = 2.85) had lower levels of acceptability compared to responsive settling with gradual reduction (AIM = 3.48) and response-based with settling in arms (AIM = 3.51) and bed (AIM = 3.23). Significant differences in acceptability (AIM) scores by country were evident for most of the interventions. As none of the interventions were universally acceptable, a model of care that provides caregivers with information about a range of interventions and the opportunity to choose based on their preferences, parenting styles and cultural beliefs may increase the likelihood of successful intervention adoption.

Details

Metrics

45 File views/ downloads
10 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Neurosciences

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image