Logo image
Australian midwives’ interpretation of the re-registration, recency of practice standard
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Australian midwives’ interpretation of the re-registration, recency of practice standard

Michelle Gray, Jennifer Rowe and Margaret Barnes
Australian Health Review, Vol.39(4), pp.462-466
2015
url
https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14070View
Published Version

Abstract

midwives re-registration requirements Recency of Practice (RoP) Standard
Objective. The aim of the present study was to investigate how midwives are responding to the changed re-registration requirements; specifically the Recency of Practice (RoP) Standard. Methods. A qualitative longitudinal case study used conversational interviews conducted annually at two time phases after the introduction of national registration. Results. Findings reveal that confusion has created challenges in demonstration of the RoP standard. This confusion was evident at individual and organisational levels. Conclusions. Professional bodies need to support staff in this transition by providing clearer guidance that exemplifies the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia expectations.

Details

Metrics

16 File views/ downloads
1276 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image