Logo image
Assessment integrity and validity in the teaching laboratory: adapting to GenAI by developing an understanding of the verifiable learning objectives behind laboratory assessment selection
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Assessment integrity and validity in the teaching laboratory: adapting to GenAI by developing an understanding of the verifiable learning objectives behind laboratory assessment selection

Sasha Nikolic, Thomas Suesse, Sarah Grundy, Rezwanul Haque, Sarah Lyden, Sulakshana Lal, Ghulam Mubashar Hassan, Scott Arthur Daniel and Marina Belkina
European Journal of Engineering Education , Vol.50(4), pp.673-701
2025
pdf
Assessment integrity and validity in the teaching laboratory adapting to GenAI by developing an understanding of the verifiable learning objectives b8.02 MBDownloadView
Published Version Open Access CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

assessment integrity blooms taxonomy generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) laboratory laboratory learning objectives measurement (LLOM)
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), such as ChatGPT, is reshaping educational paradigms by offering unparalleled benefits and introducing challenges, particularly academic integrity. This study investigates teaching laboratory practices (traditional, recorded, remote, simulation and virtual), considered an academic safe haven due to its authenticity, and examines how assessments align with learning objectives. This should reinvigorate interest in expanding laboratory learning opportunities. However, unsupervised laboratory reports, a dominant assessment type, present significant cheating risks – intensified by GenAI. Given the scant literature on laboratory assessments and their primary focus on cognitive objectives, little guidance is available regarding how to assess non-cognitive objectives. This studies innovative approach utilises a reflective survey with 134 international academic staff to explore how each assessment type can verify cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning objectives. We introduce a ‘Words of Estimative Probability’ heatmap to visualise the likelihood of verifying specific learning objectives, providing a snapshot to guide academics in holistic assessment design. This study advocates for diverse assessments, which mitigate GenAI risks and foster comprehensive skill development. This research equips educators to design secure, effective laboratory education in STEM disciplines, ensuring alignment with evolving academic and technological landscapes by offering a framework for improving assessment validity, integrity, and adaptability.

Details

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads
55 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research
Logo image