Logo image
Assessing climate change beliefs: Response effects of question wording and response alternatives
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Assessing climate change beliefs: Response effects of question wording and response alternatives

Murni Greenhill, Zoe Leviston, Rosemary Leonard and Iain Walker
Public Understanding of Science, Vol.23(8), pp.947-965
2014
url
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513480117View
Published Version

Abstract

Journalism and Professional Writing History and Philosophy of Specific Fields Curriculum and Pedagogy climate change beliefs climate change causation questions question wording effects response consistency
To date, there is no 'gold standard' on how to best measure public climate change beliefs. We report a study (N = 897) testing four measures of climate change causation beliefs, drawn from four sources: the CSIRO, Griffith University, the Gallup poll, and the Newspoll. We found that question wording influences the outcome of beliefs reported. Questions that did not allow respondents to choose the option of believing in an equal mix of natural and anthropogenic climate change obtained different results to those that included the option. Age and belief groups were found to be important predictors of how consistent people were in reporting their beliefs. Response consistency gave some support to past findings suggesting climate change beliefs reflect something deeper in the individual belief system. Each belief question was assessed against five criterion variables commonly used in climate change literature. Implications for future studies are discussed.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Communication
History & Philosophy Of Science

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action

Source: InCites

Logo image