Logo image
Are wildfire management resources in the United States efficiently allocated to protect resources at risk? A case study from Montana
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Are wildfire management resources in the United States efficiently allocated to protect resources at risk? A case study from Montana

D T O'Donnell, Tyron J Venn and D E Calkin
Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol.44(3), pp.318-332
2014
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2014.07.001View
Published Version

Abstract

bushfire choice experiment nonmarket valuation wildland-urban interface
Federal wildfire management agencies in the United States are under substantial pressure to reduce and economically justify their expenditures. To support economically efficient management of wildfires, managers need better estimates of the resource benefits and avoided damage costs associated with alternative wildfire management strategies. This paper reports findings from a choice modeling study of the wildfire management preferences of residents in Flathead County, Montana, where resources at risk include residential homes (estimated as level of home evacuations), recreational opportunities, air quality, timberland, and forest and watershed health. Residents are willing to pay higher state and county taxes to reduce wildfire impacts on all evaluated resources at risk, and reserved their highest marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for reducing exposure to unhealthy smoke. Although federal wildfire managers have prioritized protection of private property, including homes, survey respondents expressed their lowest MWTP for reducing home evacuations. When coupled with the negative externality generated by the moral hazard of wildfire suppression near the wildland-urban interface, a strong economic argument can be made against prioritizing protection of private homes in Flathead County. © 2014 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland.

Details

Metrics

6 File views/ downloads
425 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Economics

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#13 Climate Action
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image