Logo image
Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States

C A Armatas, Tyron J Venn and A E Watson
Ecological Economics, Vol.107, pp.447-456
2014
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.010View
Published Version

Abstract

stated preference methods ecosystem services environmental goods environmental valuation factor analysis survey methods qualitative methods
The underlying validity of stated preference non-market valuation methods relies on the analyst's ability to identify, select, define, and articulate the goods being valued in a way that is relevant and understandable to the respondent, which requires detailed understanding of the respondents' experiences and points of view. Poor articulation of the good being valued will result in biased to useless information for decision-makers. It should therefore be of concern to economists and policymakers that the question of how best to perform pre-design qualitative work with local stakeholders is a neglected area of inquiry. This paper assesses Q-methodology as an objective, transparent, easily replicable, and statistically-rigorous approach to qualitative research to support the selection and definition of attributes for non-market valuation. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Ecology
Economics
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: InCites

Logo image