Logo image
Anthropologists and Social Impact Assessment: Negotiating the Ethical Minefield
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Anthropologists and Social Impact Assessment: Negotiating the Ethical Minefield

Robert J Fisher
Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, Vol.9(3), pp.231-242
2008
url
https://doi.org/10.1080/14442210802251670View
Published Version

Abstract

social impact assessment environmental impact assessment consultancy professional practice professional ethics
The approval of major infrastructure and industrial developments is often dependent on the results of environmental and social impact assessments (EIA and SIA, respectively). Depending on the recommendations of 'experts' undertaking the assessments, projects are approved, rejected or modified to take account of unintended negative consequences. In practice, there are pressures on consultants to come up with favourable results, and unfavourable results are often ignored. These pressures may be subtle. For example, because consultants are usually employed by somebody with an interest in seeing projects go ahead, any consultant with a reputation for being too negative is unlikely to get work. The present paper explores issues faced by anthropologists in SIA, as well as the structure of interests within which SIA is carried out, and ways in which ethical dilemmas can be negotiated. It asks whether simply opting out of the process altogether is an ethical option preferable to critical engagement.

Details

Metrics

2 File views/ downloads
522 Record Views

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Anthropology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
#11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
#13 Climate Action
#14 Life Below Water
#15 Life on Land

Source: InCites

Logo image