Logo image
An international comparison of anti-SARS-COV-2 assays used for seroprevalence surveys from blood component providers
Journal article   Peer reviewed

An international comparison of anti-SARS-COV-2 assays used for seroprevalence surveys from blood component providers

Antoine Lewin, Steven J Drews, Ryanne Lieshout-Krikke, Christian Erikstrup, Sahar Saeed, Helen Faddy, Samra Uzicanin, Brian Custer and Sheila F O'Brien
Vox Sanguinis, Vol.116(9), pp.946-954
2021
PMCID: PMC8242559
PMID: 33914918
Appears in  COVID-19 Research
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13100View
Published Version

Abstract

seroprevalence blood component suppliers blood donors survey SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19
Background and objectives: Access to large pools of healthy adult donors advantageously positions blood component providers to undertake anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies. While numerous seroprevalence reports have been published by blood operators during the COVID-19 pandemic, details on the assay used has not been well documented. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the diversity of assays being used by blood operators and assess how this may affect seroprevalence estimates. Materials and methods: We surveyed 49 blood component providers from 39 countries. Questionnaire included information on the number and identity of assays used, the detected immunoglobulin(s) and target antigen, and performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity). Results: Thirty-eight of the 49 contacted blood suppliers provided at least partial responses. The results indicate that 19 commercial and five in-house serology assays have been used by surveyed blood operators. The Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay was the most commonly used kit and utilized by 15 blood suppliers. Two assays did not detect IgG, but detected either IgM/IgA or IgM. 68·2% of assays targeted the spike protein and 50% the nucleocapsid protein, while 18·2% targeted both viral proteins. The sensitivity and specificity of IgG-specific assays ranged from 71·9% to 100% and from 96·2% to 100%, respectively. As of 18 October 2020, the seroprevalence was below 5% in 10 of 14 countries reporting. Conclusion: Our results highlight the diversity of assays being used. Analyses comparing blood donor seroprevalence across countries should consider assay characteristics with optimization of signal/cut-off ratios and consistent methodology to adjust for waning antibody.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web Of Science research areas
Hematology

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs from InCites

Logo image