A workforce profile comparison of practising and non-practising midwives in Australia: Baseline data from the Midwives and Nurses e-cohort Study

Fiona E Bogossian; Maryann H Long; Christine Benefer; Lindy J Humphreyes Reid; Susan E M Kellett; Isabella Zhao; Catherine Turner

doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.001

Back

Journal article

Peer reviewed

A workforce profile comparison of practising and non-practising midwives in Australia: Baseline data from the Midwives and Nurses e-cohort Study

Fiona E Bogossian, Maryann H Long, Christine Benefer, Lindy J Humphreyes Reid, Susan E M Kellett, Isabella Zhao and Catherine Turner

Midwifery, Vol.27(3), pp.342-349

2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.001

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.001View

Published Version

Abstract

cohort

midwife

shortage

workforce

Existing workforce data, as an estimate of the current capability of the midwifery workforce to provide midwifery care, is confounded by systematic reporting issues that may overestimate the potential of the existing midwifery workforce. This paper reports the characteristics of qualified Australian midwives who responded to the baseline data collection in the Midwives and Nurses e-Cohort Study and compares those who are currently practising in midwifery with those who are not. Currently practising midwives represented only 52% of those respondents who identified as midwives and the profile of the typical midwife is female, aged over 40 years, Australian, married or in a de facto relationship. She has been registered for over 10 years, educated to postgraduate diploma level and currently works in a clinical midwifery role in a hospital for less than 35 hours per week. Specific deficits in the Australian midwifery workforce namely low numbers of indigenous midwives, independent practitioners and midwives suitably qualified to teach and undertake research in academia are identified. Drawing on the nationally representative e-cohort data, this cross-sectional analysis identifies for the first time the real face of the Australian midwifery workforce and provides an evidence-based foundation for future workforce planning and a methodology for other countries interested in accurately monitoring their actual and potential midwifery workforce. © 2011.

Details

Title: A workforce profile comparison of practising and non-practising midwives in Australia: Baseline data from the Midwives and Nurses e-cohort Study
Authors: Fiona E Bogossian (Author) - University of Queensland
Maryann H Long (Author) - University of Queensland
Christine Benefer (Author) - University of Queensland
Lindy J Humphreyes Reid (Author) - University of Queensland
Susan E M Kellett (Author) - University of Queensland
Isabella Zhao (Author) - University of Queensland
Catherine Turner (Author) - University of Queensland
Publication details: Midwifery, Vol.27(3), pp.342-349
Publisher: Churchill Livingstone
Date published: 2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.001
ISSN: 0266-6138
Organisation Unit: School of Health; University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland; School of Health and Sport Sciences - Legacy; School of Health and Behavioural Sciences - Legacy
Language: English
Record Identifier: 99450906602621
Output Type: Journal article

Metrics

1 File views/ downloads

261 Record Views

19 Times Cited - Web of Science

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas: Nursing

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

Source: InCites