Logo image
A systems thinking perspective on the barriers to treatment access for people with eating disorders
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A systems thinking perspective on the barriers to treatment access for people with eating disorders

Ben R Lane, Gemma J M Read, Lesley Cook and Paul M Salmon
International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol.53(2), pp.174-179
2020
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23214View
Published Version

Abstract

AcciMap barriers eating disorders sociotechnical systems systems thinking treatment access UniSC Diversity Area - Disability and Inclusion
Treatment access remains low for people with eating disorders. In addressing the complexity inherent in this challenge, this article introduces systems thinking and argues that it could provide new insights. Systems thinking views behavior as an emergent property of a system and considers the relationships between technical, organizational, and social components. Several methods used in safety science incorporate this thinking. For example, AcciMap draws focus to the influence of decisions and actions made across hierarchical levels of a system, including those by government, regulatory bodies, management, services, and individuals. By examining the findings of the existing literature on barriers to eating disorder treatment access according to these levels, it is evident that most identified barriers relate to individuals and that further research is needed to consider the influence of high-level stakeholders. Research using systems thinking should consider the causal networks of influence from government, regulatory, and organizational decisions and actions through to outcomes for clinicians and individuals. The understanding of how barriers operate within specific healthcare systems also warrants investigation. Systems thinking is yet to be formally applied in the area of eating disorders and thus represents an opportunity to inform the development and implementation of more effective, system wide interventions.

Details

Metrics

InCites Highlights

These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output

Web Of Science research areas
Nutrition & Dietetics
Psychiatry
Psychology
Psychology, Clinical

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being
#5 Gender Equality

Source: InCites

Logo image